Generally
speaking, ravens, rooks and crows have a pretty bad press. Think about their literary
appearances and you’ll find they are usually rather sinister – what about Edgar
Allan Poe, or traditional ballads like The Twa Corbies? And Ted Hughes view of
the species is pretty bleak really. Not only that, but to the untrained eye one
black bird looks much like any other black bird (although I am pleased to say I
can recognise a blackbird, and yes, I know it is a different species altogether,
but I still feel this is quite an achievement).
Anyway, in Corvus, A Life with Birds, Esther Woolfson changes all that. It
turns out that Corbids (the Latin name for the genus which includes magpies and
jackdaws, as well as ravens, rooks and crows) are friendly, intelligent, and
highly individual.
Woolfson
and her family start out with conventional pets, like rats and rabbits, but
somewhere along the way birds take over their lives. It starts when her husband’s
grandmother’s neighbour is looking to re-home some of her doves – birds which
turn out to be much more aggressive than their image suggests. So, where does
their association with peace come from, I wonder?
Next
up is Bardie, a young cockatiel bought as a birthday present for one of her
daughters, and gradually the house is filled with a succession of the waifs and
strays of the avian world, as friends and neighbours hand over injured and
abandoned birds. Over the years she learns about the birds she cares for, and
records her observations of their behaviour, so the book is part memoir, part
natural history. But it’s also about the way birds change her view of humanity
and her perception of the world and mankind’s place within it. She writes:
Of them all, it has been
the corvids, the rook, magpie and crow, who have altered forever my relationship
to the rest of the world, altered my view of a hierarchy of form, intellect,
ability, my concept of time. The world we share is broad, the boundaries and
differences between us negligible, illusory.
And
she also tells us:
We progressed together,
rook and human, and the knowledge, for the humans at least, was revelatory,
mind-expanding, world-expanding.
Woolfson
constantly wrestles with her conscience as tries to decide whether her rescue
birds should be released back into the wild, and she never sees any of the
creatures as pets. She stresses that she is not a bird-keeper or a bird-owner.
Nor is she an ornithologist, a biologist, a twitcher or a birder. She rejects
the suggestion that she is an ‘amateur domestic ethologist’, but admits there is no title to adequately
describe her role. Trying to explain, she says:
Chance, a single moment,
the confluence of fallen bird and receptive human, has changed me from observer
to something else, something I can’t even name: adoptive parent, housemate, beneficiary.
Arthur Rackham's illustration of the Twa Corbies, included because I like it, and although 'Corvus' has lovely illustrations by Helen Macdonald, I cannot scan them in because I read it on my Kindle. |
It’s
the birds themselves who take centre stage. They have likes and dislikes,
exhibit pleasure and terror, and express their desires as ably as any domestic
cat or dog. Many of them speak, or at least mimic humans, and there seems to be
no way of knowing for sure whether there intelligence behind their utterings,
but it would be nice to think there is. And the corvids all create caches of
food scraps, objects that take their fancy, and shredded paper, which can cause
the occasional domestic disaster, and means valued documents and books have to
be kept out of their reach.
Flying
through the pages are Bardie the cockatiel, with his extensive vocabulary and
Ziki, the crow who never makes a sound, but enjoys listening to Radio 3,
especially high sounds, early music, and the human voice. Then there is Max the
starling, and Spike, the adventurous magpie. But above all there is Chicken
(short for Madam Chickeboumskaya) the rook, as playful and demanding as any
young child.
It’s
one of those lovely, meandering, highly personal books that takes a subject and
runs with it until another thought intrudes, and off Woolfson goes again, on
another leisurely stroll through myths, stories, fairy tales, natural history,
the way various birds have been viewed throughout the centuries, and her own
thoughts on life. The book is packed with facts about the way birds feed and move,
their flight feathers, nesting instincts and brains – and it soon becomes apparent
that use of the word ‘bird brain’ as a term of derision is doing birds a
terrible injustice.
But
the book is never dry or dull, and Woolfson has a sense of humour, and a way
with words that breathes life into the facts. The strongest image that stayed
with me was her description of rooks:
They were all, as
Chicken would grow in time to be, of sober mien, elegant of dress in
well-tended black (except in summer when moulting renders them grey-edged and
unkempt) with neat polished feet like tight, shining boots, somewhere between
eighteenth-century Scottish minister (Henry Raeburn’s ‘Skating Minister’
perhaps) and wealthy, black-clad, fashionable 1930s Parisian lady of distinguished
years.
I
just love the picture it conjures up, of a rather portly rook, strutting along
with a self-important and self-satisfied air. It’s not the way I would usually
think about a rook, but this book will blow away all your previous ideas about
corvids (and other birds) and make you take another look at them.
I bought this book 4 years ago and still haven't read it!!! I liked the look of it, although rooks are not my favourite birds and reading your post has convinced me that I've left it on the shelves for far too long - I must read it soon.
ReplyDeleteIt completely changed my view of these birds - they were much nicer than I imagined. The doves, on the other hand, were not as pleasant as I thought. Just proves you should never judge anything or anyone until you know the facts!
Delete