In the heat
of a spacious August noon, in the great summer of 1870, the three famous
Sylvester women waited in their parlour to receive and make welcome the fourth.
The
three famous Sylvester women – Charlotte, Grace and Rachel – are sisters-in-law
who married (and tamed) three of the wild Sylvester brothers. They are big and
blonde, hard-working and warm-hearted, and they are about to meet the youngest
brother’s bride-to-be. But Miss Fanny Davis, is not a bit like them. And her
arrival brings discord and change, threatening the happiness and well-being of
the farm…
The Gipsy in the Parlour is written with Margery Sharp’s usual light touch, but I
think it’s a little darker than The Nutmeg Tree. The story is related by
an unnamed narrator, looking back on her lonely childhood, when she spent
idyllic summers with her Sylvester relatives on their Devon farm. The book
covers two years of her life, and three visits to the farm. Our narrator is 11
when Fanny Davies comes to wed the youngest brother, and she tells us:
I marvelled
how my uncle Stephen, used to the splendid Sylvester women, could have fallen
in love with such a thin, pale, dusky little gypsy.
Fanny
is:
…small, very
slender, rather limply dressed in black or grey, on her head a small black
straw hat. There was an air of the town about her; and of something else which,
I (coming out from behind my aunts), couldn’t immediately define.
That
undefined ‘something else’ is slightly worrying, a hint perhaps that things are
not quite right. And what is she doing down by the crab apple tree in the
middle of the night? And her voice may be sweet and musical, but it is ‘wooing’,
as if casting a spell over her listeners. She certainly bedazzles our narrator,
making ‘a ‘little friend’ of her, gaining her trust with sweets and
endearments. But she doesn’t take any part in family life, and she doesn’t help
around the farm or the house. She does absolutely nothing.
And
when our narrator returns to the following year she learns there has been no
wedding, for Fanny has been struck down by a mysterious malady - a ‘decline’,
the aunts explain. Our narrator is puzzled by the sudden illness, but says:
It wasn’t at that time,
particularly uncommon. Ladies lay in declines all up and down the country…
She
is relieved to see Fanny doesn’t look ill:
She had
always appeared both weakly and genteel - the two essential conditions one
couldn’t go into a decline without. (No common person went into one. Common
persons couldn’t afford to. Also, there needed to be a sofa. No sofa, no
decline.)
Was
the young narrator perceptive enough (and cynical enough) to make that comment I
wonder? Or is it an adult reflection, composed with the benefit of hindsight?
Anyway, there is Fanny, firmly ensconced on a new sofa in the parlour, using
the lustre-ware from the china cabinet, picking at the daintiest food, her
every need attended tot. The sunny room
(the aunts’ pride and joy) is dimmed and silent: even the clock has been
stopped, because its chimes’ bruise’ Fanny’s nerves. And the aunts have curbed their natural
ebullience and speak in hushed whispers as they creep about their home. The
harmony of the house is broken, the Sylvester women are no longer in total
accord with each other, and there is grey in Aunt Charlotte’s hair.
Back
home in London the narrator receives a note from Fanny, with a letter for
Cousin Charles (Aunt Charlotte’s estranged son). Believing Fanny is trying to
heal the rift, our narrator delivers the letter herself and finds Charlie
working as a chucker-out at Jackson’s Economical Saloon. She becomes friendly
with his lady friend, Clara Blow, who runs the establishment, and is as big,
capable and warm-hearted as the Sylvester women. Charlie, according to Clara,
is pining for the farm - but something (or someone) is preventing his return…
Our
narrator, whose experience of life and love is derived largely from romantic
novelettes borrowed from the succession of cooks at her parents’ home, decides
that Charlie must marry Clara and return to the farm. And she wants to cure
Fanny.
It’s
a shame to reveal what happens on the next trip to Devon, but Fanny, as we
suspected, has a cunning plan and when this is exposed Aunt Charlotte whisks
her off to London for a showdown with Charlie. Actually, whisks is the wrong
word, because preparations for the trip take five days. Aunt Charlotte travels
with her own food, so the aunts bake pasties and cakes, and she packs eggs and
a tea-caddy (for breakfasts) – imagine how a modern hotel if you did that! Then
there are her clothes:
All the
flowers were cut from her best bonnet, steamed and re-attached, the strings
were treated similarly, also ironed. Her skirt and bodice were sponged with
vinegar. Her underlinen required no attention at all, the store was so great
and so immaculate we had to pick out the best, two of each, and one dozen
cambric handkerchiefs, still bearing her maiden cypher.
Fanny
is not so splendid. She possesses the dress she stands up in, two limp dresses
more, and a peacock silk ball-gown. Her underlinen is ‘charitably’ ignored by
everyone. She has no mantle, only a shawl, and her black straw hat is too far gone
to steam into better shape.
What
Fanny does have is the ability to seize an opportunity, but it’s her
manipulative powers which give the novel a dark edge. She rules the household,
while seeming to be weak, defenceless and passive, so the aunts must bend their
will to her and subdue their real nature. And in an odd way they are complicit
in this situation. They are aware of what is happening, but they go along with
it. They won’t turn Fanny out or treat her badly because she is Stephen’s
betrothed, and they don’t want to bring shame on the Sylvester name.
I
loved this. I like Sharp’s writing style, amusing and light-hearted with (if
you’ll excuse the pun) a sharp edge. Her descriptions of people (even the minor
characters) are very astute. And while the ultimate outcome may be in little
doubt – Aunt Charlotte, after all, is a force to be reckoned with – there’s
enough tension to keep you reading to the very last page. All
in all it was a very satisfying read.
PS: I'm just wondering I could link this to the Reading England Challenge, over at Behold the Stars. The aim is to travel England
reading, and read at least one classic book per however many counties of
England you decide to read. I think this counts, since it is set largely in
Devon. But to be honest, much as I like Margery Sharp I don't really think she counts as a classic, so maybe not.
I didn't realise I owned this untilI saw one of the book covers you showed and realised I have it, tucked away on a secluded shelf. I shall read it next and probably love it, but although I really rate Margery Sharp my first of her books was 'The Innocents' and I'm still trying to find one I love as much.
ReplyDeleteOh, I do hope you like it as much as I did. I've got The Innocents, and several others - I'm reading my through as many of her books as I can find! I'd not come across her until Jane at Fleur Fisher in her World organised Margery Sharp Day, and I really didn't know what to expect but, like you, I really rate Margery Sharp. She deserves to be better known, and I do wish someone would publish her work again.
DeleteShe's such a good writer - the wickedness of her humour and the sudden twists that almost seem surreal. I haven't read this one, but it is on my list now.
ReplyDeleteI agree Her humour is very sharp, if you'll excuse the pun. The comments about women going into declines are very funny, but very cynical really.
DeleteI keep seeing reviews of this and I really must find a copy!
ReplyDeleteDo read it - the characters are wonderfully drawn, and Sharp balances the humour against slightly darker themes about manipulation. Even the Sylvester women are manipulative, but not in the same way as Fanny - they know exactly how to manage their men, and the men play a secondary role.
Delete